UNDERSTAND THE UNDERLYING CLAIM

One label. Different rights.

“Gas-backed” is not a complete specification. Separate the physical commodity from the precise delivery, payment, or ownership-related right a proposal describes.

01

Inventory & delivery

A hypothetical claim to a specified quantity should identify location, measurement, quality, responsible parties, and the conditions for completing delivery.

02

Reserve-related interests

A resource estimate needs to be connected to a defined interest. The estimate alone does not describe a holder’s payment or ownership rights.

03

Revenue & price exposure

A hypothetical payment-linked claim needs a formula, deductions, observation dates, and settlement terms. Do not assume it grants physical delivery.

Why reserves and inventory differ

The EIA defines proved reserves as estimates recoverable with reasonable certainty under existing economic and operating conditions. That is different from a quantity already recorded as stored inventory. A presentation should not move between these concepts without explaining the change in subject and the relevance to the holder. [Source]

Use a claim-by-claim comparison

Record the obligated party, claim type, unit, evidence, period, restrictions, and exit for each proposal. Compare those fields before comparing a token price. When two instruments represent different obligations, preserve that difference rather than forcing them into a common investment story.

Read the summary against the terms

If a headline describes ownership but the documents describe a payment obligation, request a written reconciliation. The most favorable description is not automatically the controlling one. The articles below provide educational questions for specialist review, not conclusions about any live instrument.

GO A LEVEL DEEPER

Field notes worth exploring.

All field notes

Good questions are a powerful starting point.

Build your understanding, one clearly explained concept at a time.

Explore the field notes
↑